{"id":2421,"date":"2021-09-13T16:07:20","date_gmt":"2021-09-13T22:07:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/?p=2421"},"modified":"2021-10-15T08:40:10","modified_gmt":"2021-10-15T14:40:10","slug":"2020-map-assessment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/2020-map-assessment\/","title":{"rendered":"New Maps Paint Colorado Blue"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h4 class=\"title wp-block-heading\"><u>Updated <strong>2021-10-15<\/strong> to reflect the &#8220;Final Approved&#8221; Congressional Map, and &#8220;Final Approved&#8221; State Senate and State House Maps<\/u><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The Final Approved maps produced by the Colorado redistricting and reapportionment committees would result in permanent Republican minorities in all legislative bodies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><p style=\"margin-left:2em;\">\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> Congress 2022 Result: 3 Republicans, 5 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> Congress 2030 Result: 1 Republican, 7 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> State Senate 2022 Result: <strike>15<\/strike> 14 Republicans, 21 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> State Senate 2030 Result: 6 Republicans, 29 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> State House 2022 Result: <strike>25<\/strike> 24 Republicans, <strike>40<\/strike> 41 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> State House 2030 Result: <strike>14<\/strike> 13 Republicans, <strike>51<\/strike> 52 Democrats<\/p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#methodology\"><u>My Methodology<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"title wp-block-heading\"><u>Maps<\/u><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Interactive versions of the maps for Congress, State Senate, and State House can all be accessed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/maps\/d\/u\/0\/edit?mid=1EFdCnXRI-cly4XIrTWQ8qwAF0Jq65ebt&amp;usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">HERE<\/a>. The checkboxes on the left allow you to control which maps are being displayed. You can easily locate districts by searching for them in the top search bar. Just type &#8220;District 7&#8221; and select the option that corresponds to the map you&#8217;re interested in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Colors denote the lifetime competitiveness of a district. Purple indicates a likelihood that the district will change hands at least once in the next decade. Red or Blue indicates that the district should remain in that party&#8217;s control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"title wp-block-heading\"><u>Congress<\/u><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p><p style=\"margin-left:2em;\">\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> 2022 Result: 3 Republicans, 5 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> 2030 Result: 1 Republican, 7 Democrats<\/p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"653\" height=\"192\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png\" alt=\"CO Congressional Competitiveness\" class=\"wp-image-2465\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1.png 653w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/1-300x88.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 653px) 100vw, 653px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Table 1<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The &#8220;Final Approved Map&#8221; produced for Congressional districts represents an improvement for Republicans over the &#8220;First Staff Map.&#8221; While the end result is the same, it delays the flip in CD-4 until 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2022 the most likely outcome under the &#8220;Third Staff Map&#8221; is that Republicans win three Congressional seats (3, 4, &amp; 5) and Democrats win five. This outcome would represent the high-water mark for Republican Congressional performance over the next decade. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Districts 1, 2, and 6 are clearly drawn to favor Democrats. Districts 4 and 5 are clearly drawn to favor Republicans. District 3 leans Republican and looks likely to remain so. I&#8217;ve heard that this map is supposed to include two competitive districts. My assumption is districts 7 and 8 were intended to be competitive districts. However, the starting point for these districts puts them outside the reach of a Republican candidate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The highest Congressional RTLA that still allowed a Republican victory under the current map was 52.1 when Mike Coffman won CD-6 in 2016. In the past decade, no other Republican candidate has come near this performance. Districts 7 and 8 are already more challenging. And that&#8217;s as of the 2020 election. By the 2022 election, these districts will be <strike>four<\/strike> six and three points, respectively, more challenging than the most challenging environment a Republican has ever prevailed in. In other words, <strong>for a Republican to win either district 7 or 8 would require an unprecedented electoral performance by that candidate<\/strong>. So ask yourself, do you think 2022 will be a better year for Republicans than 2014?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More subtly, given the current trends, both Districts 4 and 5 are poised to swing to Democrats in the long run. District 4 will cross its inflection point in <strike>2024<\/strike> 2030 and District 5 will cross its inflection point in <strike>2026<\/strike> 2028. This means that <strong>come <strike>2026<\/strike> 2030 this map would most likely result in only one Republican holding Congressional office in Colorado, in CD-3<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-2 wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"779\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map-1024x779.png\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2431\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map.png\" data-link=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/?attachment_id=2431\" class=\"wp-image-2431\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map-1024x779.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map-300x228.png 300w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map-768x585.png 768w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map-1536x1169.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/22-congressional_outcome_map-2048x1559.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"779\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map-1024x779.png\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2432\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map.png\" data-link=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/?attachment_id=2432\" class=\"wp-image-2432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map-1024x779.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map-300x228.png 300w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map-768x585.png 768w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map-1536x1169.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/30-congressional_outcome_map-2048x1559.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Likely CO Congressional Outcomes<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"title wp-block-heading\"><u>State Senate<\/u><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p><p style=\"margin-left:2em;\">\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> First Election Result: 14 Republicans, 21 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> Final Election Result: 6 Republicans, 29 Democrats<br><\/p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/sd-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"651\" height=\"705\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/sd-1.png\" alt=\"CO State Senate Competitiveness\" class=\"wp-image-2478\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/sd-1.png 651w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/sd-1-277x300.png 277w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 651px) 100vw, 651px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Table 2<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Like the Congressional map, the State Senate Map sets Republicans up for permanent minority status.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For historic context, the highest RTLA that a Republican has faced under the existing map and still achieved victory was 59.6. This was done by Sen. Priola in his 2020 re-election for SD-25. The State Senate map starts with 17 seats already above this threshold. Outside of Sen. Priola&#8217;s record-setting performance, the highest RTLA that a Republican has ever faced and still achieved victory was 44.9. That was done by Sen. Rankin in SD-8 in 2020. The &#8220;Final Approved&#8221; map for the State Senate starts 25 seats above this threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Seats that are (or could be) competitive in 2022:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><p style=\"margin-left:2em;\">\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> SD-5<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> SD-6<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> SD-12<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> SD-13<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> SD-15<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> SD-16<br>\n<\/p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As with the Congressional map, the starting point for the State Senate map will represent the Republican high-water mark. Given the current trends in each district, this map will likely result in a 6-29 Republican minority by the end of the reapportionment cycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As shown in Table 2, this map features 8 seats that meet <a href=\"https:\/\/redistricting.colorado.gov\/content\/redistricting-laws\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the new legal definition of competitiveness<\/a>. Unfortunately, all of the flips that will make these seats competitive are from Republican to Democrat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"title wp-block-heading\"><u>State House<\/u><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p><p style=\"margin-left:2em;\">\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> 2022 Result: <strike>25<\/strike> 24 Republicans, <strike>40<\/strike> 41 Democrats<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> 2030 Result: <strike>14<\/strike> 13 Republicans, <strike>51<\/strike> 52 Democrats<\/p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hd-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"525\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hd-1-525x1024.png\" alt=\"CO State House Competitiveness\" class=\"wp-image-2479\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hd-1-525x1024.png 525w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hd-1-154x300.png 154w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hd-1.png 654w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Table 3<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Colorado Republicans were already a minority in the State House and they would remain so under the &#8220;Final Approved&#8221; State House map. &#8230;decisively. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The highest RTLA that a Republican candidate for State House has faced under the existing map and still achieved victory has been 61.5. This was done by Rep. Navarro-Ratzlaff in HD-47 in 2012. The new map features 29 districts that start above this threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In more recent history the highest RTLA that a Republican candidate for State House has faced and still achieved victory was 48.2. This was also in HD-47, this time by Rep. Luck in 2020. This new map features <strike>40<\/strike> 43 seats that start above this threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2022 potentially competitive seats:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><p style=\"margin-left:2em;\">\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-16<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-19<br>\n<strike><i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-20<br><\/strike>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-21<br>\n<strike><i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-22<br><\/strike>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-43<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-44<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-51<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-57<br>\n<i class=\"fas fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i> HD-59<br>\n<\/p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unlike the other maps, the State House map does feature a number of districts that are trending Republican. However, none of those with a right-ward trend are starting from a point of having enough strength for it to make a difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"title wp-block-heading\"><u>My Methodology<\/u><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"methodology\">Let me start by saying this &#8212; this really isn&#8217;t as complicated as I make it sound.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This methodology is based on two concepts, the first is &#8220;RTLA.&#8221; This is an <strong>index<\/strong> that allows one to compare the competitiveness of districts across time and geography. Loosely put, this is the percentage of Unaffiliated (and other) voters that would need to vote for the Republican candidate in order for the Republican candidate to receive 51% of the total vote. Unlike most methods for assessing district competitiveness, &#8220;RTLA&#8221;  is not skewed by changes in the underlying composition of the electorate such as shifts in voter registration or changes in turnout rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote\"><blockquote><p>I&#8217;ll say it again: past election results are not a valid measure of district competitiveness.<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>This concept is discussed further in two blog posts:<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/sd20-fallacy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The SD20 Fallacy<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/how-republicans-will-lose-2020-reapportionment\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">How Republicans Will Lose 2020 Reapportionment<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The second concept is much less revolutionary &#8212; it&#8217;s the idea that the voters within a district create that particular district&#8217;s performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taking these two ideas together, we can assess the competitiveness of new districts by mapping the performance of the old districts to the voters within that district. Then we assign those voters to their new districts and average the measures of performance assigned to each voter to get a sense of how the new district will perform. In essence, we&#8217;re calculating a weighted average of the performance of the old districts according to how much they overlap the new district. However, we&#8217;re using voters, not land area, to define the contribution of the old districts to the new.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-1-1024x536.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2424\" width=\"768\" height=\"402\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-1-1024x536.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-1-300x157.png 300w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-1-768x402.png 768w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-1.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Graphic 1<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Consider Graphic 1. We know the performance of the two &#8220;Old Districts&#8221;. &#8220;Old District 1&#8221; has an RTLA of 40, and &#8220;Old District 2&#8221; has an RTLA of 70. We assign those values to each voter within the respective districts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-2.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-2-1024x536.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2425\" width=\"768\" height=\"402\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-2-1024x536.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-2-300x157.png 300w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-2-768x402.png 768w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-2.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Graphic 2<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Once the &#8220;New District&#8221; is drawn we are able to identify which voters it contains. In the Graphic 2 example, we see that it contains an even split &#8212; two voters from each of the old districts. To arrive at the RTLA for the &#8220;New District&#8221; we simply average the RTLA figures for these four voters to calculate the &#8220;New District&#8221; RTLA of 55.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-3-2.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-3-2-1024x536.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2447\" width=\"768\" height=\"402\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-3-2-1024x536.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-3-2-300x157.png 300w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-3-2-768x402.png 768w, https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/method-3-2.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Graphic 3<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>If the &#8220;New District&#8221; contains more voters from one district than the other (more likely) there&#8217;s no difference. We again average the RTLA figures for the voters within the new district together. In this case, there are three voters from &#8220;Old District 1&#8221; and two from &#8220;Old District 2.&#8221; Since &#8220;Old District 1&#8221; has a lower RTLA this pulls down the average for the &#8220;New District.&#8221; Now the RTLA for the &#8220;New District&#8221; is only 52.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&#8217;s that easy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&#8217;s only executing this method on a four-million voter data set that makes it challenging. For those who are interested, you can review all of the code involved in the precise calculations at <a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/bengen343\/2020-co-redistricting\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">this GitHub repository<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The third round of staff maps produced by the Colorado redistricting and reapportionment committees would result in permanent Republican minorities in all legislative bodies. But just how big a disadvantage will we be at?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2439,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[23,19,39],"class_list":["post-2421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-analysis","tag-data","tag-stategy"],"wps_subtitle":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2421"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2421\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2480,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2421\/revisions\/2480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constellationpolitical.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}